Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Divyashree Infrastructure Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09 to 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Divyashree Infrastructure Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)

Since the assessee was undertaking construction of the projects, all the URD purchases have been included in the “Capital work in progress” account. We notice that the assessing officer has identified URD purchases every year and he has held them to be bogus in nature, i.e., according to AO, the assessee has inflated the expenses by accounting URD purchases. We noticed that the AO did not make addition of the alleged inflated/bogus expenses in the respective years. Howev

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930