This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No addition for bogus purchases – Depreciation cannot be disallowed on such purchase
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Divyashree Infrastructure Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2008-09 to 2014-15
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Divyashree Infrastructure Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Since the assessee was undertaking construction of the projects, all the URD purchases have been included in the “Capital work in progress” account. We notice that the assessing officer has identified URD purchases every year and he has held them to be bogus in nature, i.e., according to AO, the assessee has inflated the expenses by accounting URD purchases. We noticed that the AO did not make addition of the alleged inflated/bogus expenses in the respective years. However, the AO has taken the view that the depreciation claimed should be ...





