Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs. Zoom Communications Private Limited (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA 07/2010,(2010)
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/05/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

CIT Vs. Zoom Communications Private Limited (Delhi High Court)

ITA 07/2010,(2010) 191 Taxman 179, [2010] 327 ITR 510

Judgement Delivered on: 24.05.2010,

Delhi High Court Ruling: If the assessee makes a claim which is not only incorrect in law but is also wholly without any basis and the explanation furnished by him for making such a claim is not found to be bonafide, it would be difficult to say that he would still not be liable to penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act 

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. srinivasan says:

    going back to dharmendra textiles.and there were several judjment after that to convey that the mistake of this type sould not attract the penalty.
    This appears to be contrary and we are back to square one

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031