Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Malay Mukharjee Vs State of Assam (Gauhati High Court)
Appeal Number : Case No. Bail Appln./1232/2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/05/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Malay Mukharjee Vs State of Assam (Gauhati High Court)

Introduction: In a notable case, Malay Mukharjee Vs State of Assam, the Gauhati High Court has granted bail to the driver and owner of a truck seized for the transportation of cough syrup bottles without a proper E-way Bill. The accused, in this case, had been in judicial custody for 137 days prior to the ruling.

Analysis: The case, lodged under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, involved the transport of a large number of cough syrup bottles. Mr. Malay Mukharjee, the truck owner, and Mr. Hironmoy Sarkar, the driver, were transporting a consignment of drugs from Daffodil Drugs Pvt. Ltd. to A.K. Drug Distributors in Assam when their vehicle was intercepted.

The defence counsel argued that the transport was lawful, backed by valid documents including a GST invoice and E-way bill. The Court took note of these documents, verifying them to be genuine. The prosecution, however, stated that the investigation was still ongoing.

While the court acknowledged the bar in Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act, it deemed further detention of the accused unnecessary for the investigation. The Court decided to grant bail to both accused under certain conditions, ensuring their cooperation with the investigation.

Conclusion: The Gauhati High Court’s decision in Malay Mukharjee Vs State of Assam delivers a balanced approach, weighing the alleged crime against the validity of supporting documents and the status of the investigation. It also underscores the importance of lawful transport of pharmaceutical goods and the severe consequences of their contravention. Despite ongoing investigations, the court showed leniency, granting bail to the accused, thereby setting a precedent in similar cases involving transportation of pharmaceutical goods.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF GAUHATI HIGH COURT

Heard Mr. A.M. Bora, learned Sr. Counsel for the accused petitioners as well as Mr. R.J. Baruah, learned Addl. P.P., Assam for the State respondent.

By this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the accused/petitioner, namely 1) Malay Mukharjee and 2) Hironmoy Sarkar have prayed for grant of bail in connection Golakganj P.S. Case No. 13/2023 u/s 21(c) of the NDPS Act, 1985.

The case diary as called for is placed before the Court.

Mr. A.M. Bora, learned Sr. Counsel appearing for the accused petitioners, submits that the accused petitioners have been in judicial custody for 137 days despite being innocent. Mr. Bora submits that the accused petitioner No.1 is the owner and co-driver of the seized truck and the accused petitioner No.2 is the driver employed by the accused petitioner No.1. According to Mr. Bora, the said truck has been engaged in transportation business under Road Kings Pvt. Ltd. for transportation of consignments of medicines with due challan, e-way bills and other requisite documents. Mr. Bora submits that on the alleged date of interception of their truck, the accused petitioners were transporting the consignment of drugs sold by the agency run by Daffodil Drugs Pvt. Ltd. to a wholesale distributor of Cachar District, Assam namely, A.K. Drug Distributors with valid documents such as GST invoice and e-way bill from West Bengal to Cachar. In this regard, Mr. Bora has drawn attention to the consignment notes vide Annexure-VI and VII respectively. Mr. Bora, learned Sr. Counsel, therefore, submits that the accused petitioners were, thus, discharging their obligations and the Court of learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), Dhubri, after examining all the relevant documents such as the invoices, e-payment bills etc., has been satisfied the same to be genuine vide order, dated 15.03.2023. Further, Mr. Bora submits that the Proprietor of A.K. Drug Distributors at Silchar, Cachar has submitted a petition under Section 451 read with Section 457 Cr.P.C. for releasing the seized articles of Codeine based cough syrup bottles packed in 388 cartons claiming to be the absolute owner, which is presently under consideration of the said learned Court. Therefore, Mr. A.M. Bora, learned Senior Counsel, submits that the accused petitioners being absolutely innocent, they may be directed to be released on bail.

Opposing the bail application, Mr. R.J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, submits that the case diary reveals that the case is at investigation stage and the invoices and e-payment bills are genuine.

The case relates to recovery and seizure of 62,080 nos. of Eskuf Cough Syrup bottles (Codeine Phosphate Chloropheniramine Maleate Syrup) of 100 ml. each while being transported in a vehicle bearing registration No. WB 51C 5398.

A perusal of the case record reveals that both the accused petitioners are named in the FIR. The seizure memo shows that 62,080 bottles of Eskuf cough syrup containing Codeine Phosphate were seized from the exclusive possession of both the accused petitioners. The F.S.L. report on the seized cough syrup samples is yet to be received. The contents of FIR shows that on interception of the seized truck and on demand by police, the accused petitioners produced documents such as GST Invoice, e-way bills and transport receipt, which were seized. The investigating officer has noted that the aforesaid consignment of seized cough syrup bottles were dispatched by Daffodil Drugs Pvt. Ltd, Gangarampur Road, Banerjee Para, Maheshtala to A.K. Drug Distributors, Silchar, Assam through Road King Pvt. Ltd. transporter, Kolkata as per the seized GST Invoice, e-way bills and transport receipt. The investigation reveals that the seized cough syrup bottles were meant for sale in the western part of India, meaning thereby not for sale in the North-eastern region.

Copy of all the aforestated documents are annexed to the instant bail application. The investigating officer has got the documents verified from the competent authority and found to be valid as per the provisions of the Assam Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court of learned Special Judge (N.D.P.S. Act), Dhubri in his order, dated 15.03.2023 recorded that as per the report of the Assistant Commissioner of Taxes, Dhubri, dated 28.02.2023, the invoices and e-payment bills sent for verification found to be valid.

On the other hand, by filing Misc. Case No.60/2023, before the aforesaid court, the Proprietor of A.K. Drug Distributors, Silchar has claimed to be the consignee of the seized cough syrup bottles and accordingly, prayed for custody of the same by imposing any conditions(s). The learned Court appears to have been awaiting for the F.S.L. report and thus, pending for consideration.

Having heard the learned counsel of both sides and consideration of the averments made in the application supported by all relevant documents along with the materials on the case diary and despite the bar in Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act, this Court is of the considered opinion that subject to final outcome in investigation, for ends of justice further continuation of detention in judicial custody of the accused petitioners in the interest of the ongoing investigation may not be warranted.

Accordingly, it is provided that each of the accused petitioners, named above, shall be released on bail of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) only with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge (NDPS), Dhubri subject to the following conditions-

i) That the accused petitioners shall cooperate with the investigating officer as and when required;

ii) That the accused petitioners shall not directly or indirectly makeb any inducement, threat of promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts either to the investigating officer or to the Court; and

iii) That the accused petitioners shall refrain from committing any similar offence in future of which they are accused or suspected of commission. Breach of any of the above conditions shall render cancellation of the bail in accordance with law.

Return the case diary.

This disposes of the bail application.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2024
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031