Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

Assessment proceedings suffer from major procedural flaws due to lack of a proper SCN

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2023 taxguru.in 967
Case Name
Solex Energy Limited Vs the State of Jharkhand (Jharkhand High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

Solex Energy Limited Vs the State of Jharkhand (Jharkhand High Court) 

The Hon’ble Jharkhand High Court in M/s. Solex Energy Limited v. the State of Jharkhand and Ors. [W.P (T) No. 404 of 2022 dated January 31, 2023] has set aside the summary of order issued in Form GST DRC-07 to the assessee by the Revenue Department on the grounds of non-issuance of a proper Show Cause Notice (“SCN”). Held that, the assessment proceedings suffer from serious procedural errors in absence of a proper SCN, where there were serious discrepancies in the proceedings. Thus, the entire proceedings are vitiated.

Facts:

M/s. Solex Energy Limited (“the Petitioner”) is engaged in the business of Engineering, procurement and construction of solar power generating system and is also a manufacturer of solar panels. After filing return in Form GSTR-3B for the month of October, 2020, the Petitioner noticed that an amount of INR 39,77,727/- was debited from its electronic credit ledger and INR 21,060/- was debited from its electronic cash ledger. Upon enquiry, it was found that the amount was recovered against an outstanding demand created vide summary of order in Form GST DRC-07 dated January 21, 2019 (“the Impugned Summary Order”) passed by the Revenue Department (“the Respondent”), which the Petitioner had no knowledge of.

Subsequently, the Petitioner preferred an application under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (“the RTI Act”) seeking information regarding the copy of Summary of SCN in Form GST DRC-01, summary of statement in Form GST DRC-02 and other relevant documents related to the Impugned Summary Order and the same was provided to it.

The Petitioner claimed that it had not received the summary of notice and summary of statement related to the Impugned Summary Order and none of the documents were signed by any authority nor any detailed order was issued.

Being aggrieved, this petition has been filed.

Issue:

Whether the Impugned Summary Order passed by the Respondent and the consequent recovery was in accordance with law?

Held:

The Hon’ble Jharkhand High Court in W.P (T) No. 404 of 2022 held as under:

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

Bimal Jain
Name: Bimal Jain
Qualification: LL.B / Advocate
Company: A2Z Taxcorp LLP
Location: Delhi, Delhi
Articles Published: 2,897

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.