Penalty under rule 26 of CER rightly imposed on CA for false issuance of performance certificate
Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

Penalty under rule 26 of CER rightly imposed on CA for false issuance of performance certificate

Case Law Details

Case Name
Vishal Jain Vs C.C.E. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement
Vishal Jain Vs C.C.E. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) CESTAT Ahmedabad held that penalty under rule 26 of Central Excise Rules rightly imposed on the Chartered Accountant who issued false performance certificate to fraudulent parties based on which fraudulent advance license were obtained. Facts- The company M/s. Iqbal Synthetics Pvt. Ltd. have cleared the goods from their EOU clandestinely under the guise of removal of the goods against advance license without payment of duty. For the purpose of advance license, the appellant who is a Chartered Accountant had issued performance certificate to M/s. Thejava...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *