Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

Charges of clandestine removal needs to be substantiated by evidence

Case Law Details

Case Name
Raghuveer Rolling Mills Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Allahabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement Raghuveer Rolling Mills Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Allahabad) CESTAT Allahabad held that clandestine removal is a serious charge and requires to be substantiated by evidence. Here, as department has not adduced any additional evidence to substantiate the allegation of clandestine removal not sustained. Facts- M/s Raghuveer Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Iron Flats, spring Leaves and Agriculture implements. Officers of Central Excise visited the premises of the appellants and conducted investigations. A show cause notice ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *