Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Carbon Resources Private Limited Vs The Prinicipal Commissioner of Customs (Port) & Anr. (Calcutta High Court)
Appeal Number : WPA No. 21089 of 2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/01/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Carbon Resources Private Limited Vs The Prinicipal Commissioner of Customs (Port) & Anr. (Calcutta High Court)

Petitioners in this writ petition are aggrieved by inaction on the part of the respondents to dispose of their first representation dated December 26, 2020 being Annexure P3 to the writ petition as well as the second representation by way of a reminder dated March 23, 2021 as appears from page 72 of the writ petition, details whereof would appear from the contents of the said representations.

Petitioners also submit that such action of non-disposal of such representations is also in violation of a circular of the Central Board of Excise & Customs, New Delhi, Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), Government of India being Circular No. 8/2018-Cus., dated March 23, 2018 F. No.450/119/2017-Cus.IV.

Mr Maiti, learned advocate appearing for the respondents, is not in a position to defend the inaction on the part of the respondents in disposing of the aforesaid representations. He submits that he is not sure whether the aforesaid representations are still pending or have been disposed of, in spite of specific submission made by the petitioners in court that such representations are still pending and have not been disposed of.

HC directs Customs Commissioner to consider representation of Appellant & Pass reasoned & speaking order

Considering the submission of the parties, this writ petition, WPA No.21089 of 2021, is disposed of directing the respondents concerned to consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation dated March 23, 2021 in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners or their authorised representative, within six weeks from the date of communication of this order.

It is recorded that this court has not gone into the merits of the said representation. The respondents, while considering and disposing of the said representation, shall act strictly in accordance with law.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
February 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728