Telangana High Court mandates granting personal hearing even if notices sent to unregistered email in Raghava-HES-Navayauga (JV) vs. Additional Commissioner of Central Tax.
Telangana High Court declares GST Section 74 proceedings not sustainable if tax and interest are settled before the issuance of a Show Cause Notice (SCN).
The court noted that the Customs Authority’s refusal was based on an incorrect interpretation of the law and failed to recognize the Supreme Court’s directive that allows for the amendment of documents under Section 149 of the Customs Act without a strict time limit.
Prahitha Constructions Private Limited Vs Union of India (Telangana High Court) The Hon’ble Telangana High Court in the case of M/s. Prahitha Constructions Private Limited v. Union of India and Ors. [Writ Petition No. 5493 of 2020 dated February 09, 2024] dismissed the writ petition and held that transfer of development rights would be considered […]
Explore Ahmed Memorial vs. CIT case in Telangana High Court. Analysis of administrative circular impact on CIT decisions. Bank account operation allowed as interim measure.
Telangana High Court’s landmark decision in M/s. A.S.E. India v. Union of India, highlighting invalidity of blocking ITC without a CGST Act Section 74 order or Rule 86A compliance.
Telangana High Court upholds GST liability on director’s personal guarantee. Ruling supports Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) under GST. Read the full judgment.
The proceedings drawn, admittedly being beyond a period that was prescribed under sub-section (2A) of Section 153 and the consequential orders passed were all beyond the period of limitation prescribed under sub-section (2A) of Section 153 hence, the same being not sustainable, deserved to be and was accordingly set aside/quashed.
Telangana High Court held that the Registration of a document does not create any title. The action of non-registration of a document under Section 22A of the Registration Act, 1908 does not prevent a person of the right to enjoy his property.
As per Revised Pension Rules, 1980, family pension is not admissible to the second wife as marrying another wife, (when one wife is living) without obtaining the approval of Government is contrary to Rule 25 of A.P. Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964. In absence of Government approval, death benefit not entitled to second wife.
