The present case is one such case, wherein, enormous delay of 1788 days occasioned in preferring the second appeal due to the lapses on the part of the officials functioning under the State, though valuable Government lands were involved.
Supreme Court questions the delay in making the GST Appellate Tribunal functional in the Team Computers case. Refund recovery order stayed pending further updates.
Held that there is no ownership in law which can be recognized insofar as the appellant herein is concerned inasmuch as his name has not been entered in the registration certificate concerning the vehicle in terms of the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Supreme Court dismissed the SLP filed by the Revenue Department, upholding Delhi High Court’s judgment on CENVAT credit refund to BT India.
The same was responded to by the Chartered Accountant and on becoming aware of the legal representatives of the deceased-original assessee order dated 30.07.2022 was passed u/s. 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Supreme Court upholds Labour Court’s factual findings, reinstating a dismissed employee while denying back wages. Read the Ganapati Bhikarao Naik judgment highlights.
Supreme Court held that employee remaining absent from duty for 90 days without intimating employer and employee not responding to notice addressed to delinquent justifies employer action of terminating employee by treating as abandonment of service.
The Supreme Court orders the lifting of a bank account attachment in Rhc Global Exports Vs Union of India, clarifying jurisdiction under GST law.
Supreme Court held that disciplinary proceedings against appellant (commercial tax officer) pertaining to charges punishable with major penalty without oral evidence recorded by department in support of charges is totally vitiated and non-est in the eye of law.
Supreme Court held that a driver holding a license for Light Motor Vehicle (LMV) class, under Section 10(2)(d) for vehicles with a gross vehicle weight under 7,500 kg, is permitted to operate a ‘Transport Vehicle’ without needing additional authorization under Section 10(2)(e) of the MV Act.
