Sponsored
    Follow Us:

ITAT Pune

Expense on development of Tools & Designs cannot be termed as revenue expense

September 12, 2021 579 Views 0 comment Print

DCIT Vs Sutham Electric Ltd. (ITAT Pune) The solitary issue in the present case relates to the allowability of the expenditure incurred on development of Tools and Designs which are used in the business and manufacturing of automotive switch gears of Rs.3,75,00,000/- as revenue expenditure. This expenditure was shown as deferred revenue expenditure written off […]

ITAT Pune deletes addition for share capital & share premium

September 9, 2021 1059 Views 0 comment Print

DCIT Vs Mahalaxmi TMT Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Pune) AO found that the assessee company was established dated 10 August 2004 i.e. during the financial year 2004-05 corresponding to the assessment year 2005-06 and it did not carry out any business activity till the year under consideration. Conversely, it has issued shares at a premium of […]

No section 40(a)(i) disallowance for commission paid to overseas agents

July 15, 2021 1848 Views 0 comment Print

Carraro India Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)  It is seen that the assessee paid commission of Rs.58.65 lakh to overseas agents for export orders obtained by them in overseas territories. Section 195 mandates the deduction of tax at source from any sum paid by the assessee which is ‘chargeable under the provisions of this […]

Section 56(2)(v) relative definition not apply for Specified Domestic Transactions

July 14, 2021 3996 Views 0 comment Print

Smt. Anita Sunil Mahajan Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) Definition of ‘relative’ for Specified Domestic Transactions (SDTs) should be as per Section 2(41) of Income Tax Act, 1961 and Section 56(2)(v) would not apply. Case Summary: – Facts of the case: During AY 2013-14, Smt. Anita Sunil Mahajan (Assessee), filed her return declaring total income at […]

Section 68 addition based on mere bald findings not sustainable

July 12, 2021 771 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Pune partially allows appeal in Amrutlal Gangaji Choudhary Vs. DCIT. Section 68 addition lacks cogent reasons. Remanded for de novo adjudication.

Subsidies to accelerate industrial development & promote employment opportunities is capital receipt

July 6, 2021 585 Views 0 comment Print

Inox Air Products Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) The issue in the present appeal relates to the subsidy received by the assessee company is whether in the nature of capital or revenue. There is no need to extract the schemes of the subsidy policies of the respective States as the Assessing Officer had set […]

Section 80IB deduction eligible on Sum Received as ‘On-Money’ on Flat Bookings

July 2, 2021 1557 Views 0 comment Print

Surana Mutha Bhasali Developers Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) The doctrine of approbate and reprobate does not allow the Department to blow hot and cold in the same breath, thereby accepting one consequence arising from the statement of the assessee while rejecting the other one. When the assessee made a surrender with the clear backdrop of […]

Subsequent amendment in limitation cannot revive time barred action

June 30, 2021 2043 Views 0 comment Print

Bank of India – Kirkee Branch Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Conclusion: In present facts of the case, it was held by the Hon’ble Tribunal that expired time limit does not get revived with the extended time limit inserted later on. Held: In present facts of the case, the assessee-bank accepted deposits from its customers, on […]

Restrict transfer pricing addition to international transactions under manufacturing activity segment: ITAT

June 29, 2021 2106 Views 0 comment Print

Hyundai Construction Equipment India Private Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) Ground no.8 of the appeal is against making transfer pricing adjustment on entity level rather than restricting it to the AE transactions. The TPO computed the transfer pricing addition by considering revenues from Manufacturing segment‘ in totality at the entity level The DRP did not […]

ALP determinable on combined accounts approach in case of failure to separate common costs

June 18, 2021 1656 Views 0 comment Print

TPO determined ALP on the combined accounts approach rather than the split approach adopted by assessee as assessee failed to substantiate such common material costs were properly allocated segment-wise and Transfer Pricing Adjustment made at entity level should be restricted to international transactions only.

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31