Madras High Court dismissed writ petition, stating that if there is an alternative remedy available, the petitioner should pursue that remedy before resorting to a writ petition.
Madras High Court directed the petitioner to deposit maximum penalty of 200% of the tax involved in detention matter as once the mandatory pre-deposit is complied, the order has no force and all the further recovery proceedings will be subject to final outcome of the appeal.
Madras High Court held that issuance of communication to pay penalty amount within prescribed period, despite of interim orders of division bench directing customs department not to take coercive steps, is untenable in law.
Madras High Court held that non-submission of certified copy of order within a period of 7 days as stipulated under Rule 108(3) of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (TNGST Act) is only a technical defect.
Madras High Court held that without instructions, without verifying the records, the petitioner cannot direct his representatives to appear. Accordingly, such representation is untenable in law.
Revenue department cannot continue attachment of bank accounts for several years under Section 83 of the CGST Act for Delay in issuing SCN
Eastman Exports Global Clothing (P) Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner (CT) (Madras High Court) Reversal of Input Tax Credit (‘ITC’) on the loss of inputs which is inherent to the process of manufacturing The Division Bench of Hon’ble Madras High Court recently in the case of Eastman Exports Global Clothing Pvt limited Vs Asst.Commissioner of CT, Tirupur settled […]
Sri Priyanga Agencies Vs Assistant Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (Madras High Court) In a case between Sri Priyanga Agencies and the Assistant Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, the Madras High Court has issued a common order. The court has disposed of the main writ petition and two related Writ Miscellaneous Petitions (WMPs). […]
In the case of J. Kishorekumar Vs ITO, Madras High Court examines tax notices issued to deceased assessee’s legal representative, offering detailed insights into legal implications and proceedings.
Explore the Madras High Court’s ruling on natural justice in re-assessment proceedings under the Income-Tax Act, 1961, addressing notice discrepancies and principles of fairness.
