Madras High Court rules that any order under Sec 144(C)(1) must be a draft assessment; detailed analysis of Ramco Cements Ltd. vs ITO case provided.
Madras High Court quashes state GST authority’s demand order due to jurisdictional issues. Learn about the case of Ralco Synergy Pvt. Ltd Vs Joint Commissioner of State Tax.
Madras High Court ruling states that once all pending GST returns are filed until the date of cancellation, the taxpayer’s GSTN can be restored.
Madras High Court held that digital data collected by the department in the course of search and seizure without following the Digital Evidence Investigation Manual issued by CBDT makes the entire search and seizure unsustainable and ab initio bad
Madras High Court held that valid ITC availed on purchase tax which remained unutilized is entitled for the transitional credit under section 140 of TNGST Act, 2017
Madras High Court held that receipt of export proceeds through authorized dealers like Paypal is in accordance with the direction issued by RBI and hence refund duly admissible.
Explore the Vajra Global vs. Income Tax case at Madras High Court. Detailed analysis of the judgment, TDS credit issues, and the rightful refund of Rs.7,65,000.
SL Lumax Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner of State Taxes-II (Madras high court) This case involves SL Lumax Limited challenging a demand notice issued by the Deputy Commissioner of State Taxes-II (Madras High Court). The dispute centers around the classification of goods manufactured by SL Lumax under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime in India. […]
Madras High Court criticizes the classification of Harpic and Lizol under 28% GST slab rate, citing lack of application of mind. Detailed analysis and judgment provided.
Delhi High Court rules GST assessment order invalid if it doesn’t meet Section 74’s requirements. The case highlights the importance of legal compliance.
