Madras High Court held that as an appeal is already filed which is still pending and statutory pre-deposit amount paid by the petitioner, VAT authorities cannot recover further sum from petitioner’s bank account or from any other source till statutory appeal is disposed of on merits.
Madras High Court held that approaching court directly against the impugned notice without allowing department to consider the defence reply and providing opportunity of hearing is not in accordance with law. Accordingly, court directed petitioner to appear for personal hearing before respondent.
Raw enterprises Vs The Principal Commissioner of Customs (Madras High Court) Madras High Court held that as per provisions of section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962 departmental authorities need to take decision on provisional release application. Petitioner directed to furnish fresh application u/s 110A as against the allegation that application is not in prescribed […]
Madras High Court held that initiation of coercive recovery proceedings, by exercising power under section 45 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, without passing of assessment order is invalid and unsustainable.
Madras High Court held that invocation of extended period of limitation unjustified as non-disclosure or claim of non-liability was on the basis of bonafide interpretation of law.
Madras High Court held that administrative side cannot seek leave to review an order passed by its own judgements on the judicial side as the same would amount to undermining the judicial fibre.
Madras High Court held that simultaneous initiation of proceedings, both by Central Authority and by the State Authority, under GST Act is impermissible under law as per the provisions of Section 6(2)(b) of the GST Act, 2017.
Madras High Court held that as per provisions of section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, when there is no enhancement of assessment or penalty, there is no necessity for the respondent to adhere to the principles of natural justice.
KCP Infra Limited Vs Principal Secretary (Madras High Court) Madras High Court held that on account of revision of GST rate on works contract to 18% instead of earlier 12%, the court directed the National Highway Authorities to revise GST rates on bills raised by the petitioner (works contractor). Facts- The petitioner is a Works […]
Madras High Court granted short accommodation to make further submissions in the case of revocation of cancellation of GST registration.
