ITAT Chennai held that expenditure of Bio-technology Research & Development cannot be disallowed simply on the allegation that expenditure was incurred before the commencement of a new line of business as such matching concept not application in the present case.
Kalaignar TV Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) The assessee has claimed legal expenses and travelling & conveyance expenses before the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer mainly disallowed the expenditure claimed by the assessee on the ground that the legal proceedings was undertaken in respect of the charges framed against the Directors and shareholders of […]
ITAT Chennai held that capital gain exemption under section 54 of the Income Tax Act includes investment in purchase or construction of one or more than one residential house
Euro Home Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) CIT(A) held that the provisions of Sec.44AD would not apply to commission income and the rental income received would be assessed under Income from House Property. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed against which the assessee is in further appeal before us. ITAT find that commission income would not come […]
Devarajulu Natarajan Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Ld. CIT(A), noted that post demonetization, cash deposited in State Bank of Hyderabad was only Rs.2.50 Lacs and cash deposited in Canara bank was Rs.6 Lacs only. Accordingly, the addition was restricted to Rs.8.50 Lacs. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before us. The Ld. AR pleaded for […]
ITAT Chennai held that as the value of goods are duly accepted by the Central Excise department without there being any modification then AO doesn’t have any jurisdiction to go beyond the same.
Raymold Lighting Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) ITAT noted that this appeal is against the rectification order passed by A.O and the impugned order by CIT(A) on this order of rectification u/s. 154 of the Act dated 27.09.2017. We noted that in the original appeal filed before CIT(A) by the assessee, the assessee has […]
Once the maintenance charges were attributable to the letting out services provided, same derived from providing services was to be considered under the head income from other sources and not income from house property
Saravana Foundation Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Against levy of penalty under section 271B of the Act, the assessee has submitted the reasons for the delay in filing the audit report before the ld. CIT(A) that the accounts audited under section 44AB of the Act belatedly as the assessee was not keeping good health and the […]
Delay cannot be condoned as Assessee could not file any evidences as to how Assessee’s Counsel was preoccupied in his professional commitments for 649 days.
