Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ullattil Sillu Vs ITO (ITAT Cochin)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-2018
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ullattil Sillu Vs ITO (ITAT Cochin)

Interval between date of cash withdrawal & deposit in bank does not warrant addition: ITAT Cochin

The case of Ullattil Sillu vs. ITO (ITAT Cochin) concerns the treatment of cash deposits made during the demonetization period. The assessee had filed a return declaring an income of Rs. 2,83,130, but the Assessing Officer (AO) added Rs. 2,42,000 as unexplained money, claiming that the deposits made into the bank were not substantiated. The assessee explained that the deposits were sourced from cash withdrawals made on Aug

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 263 Cannot Be Invoked Solely for Lack of DVO Report: Karnataka HC Audit Fee Allowable Only When Liability Crystallizes, Not on Estimates or Historical Basis One-Time Membership Fees as Capital Receipts for Coop Bank: ITAT Pune ITAT Pune Allows Partial Relief in Demonetization Cash Deposits Case Section 263 Revision Requires Lack of Inquiry, Not Just Inadequate Inquiry View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930