ITAT Delhi acknowledged the significance of jurisdictional facts and held that a quasi-judicial authority must decide the issue of jurisdiction when raised. The lack of a clear decision on jurisdiction prompted the ITAT to set aside the PCIT’s order and remand the matter for a fresh decision, including the preliminary issue of jurisdiction.
ITAT Delhi cancels penalty under section 271(1)(c) in Identity Wellness Centre case. Displacement of fair market value supported by valuation report by AO.
ITAT’s decision favored Candor Kolkata One Hi-Tech Structures, allowing deductions under Section 80-IAB for on various incomes, including car parking, health club, food court, and interest.
BCP V Singapore FVCI Pte. Ltd. wins against reassessment by ITAT Delhi. Detailed analysis of Rs.203.56 Cr. redemption income dispute. No escapement found.
ITAT Delhi decision on TDS under section 194C for CAM charges. Explore Liberty Retail Revolutions Ltd. vs ACIT case details, analysis, and conclusion.
ITAT Delhi rules in Amit Laroya vs ACIT case, stating salary of a Korean resident for services outside India is not taxable in India under Article 15(1) of India-Korea DTAA.
Delhi ITAT rules on time limitation for Assessment Order under Sec 144C(4). Analysis of objections filing, jurisdiction, and compliance with Income Tax Act. Full order details provided.
ITAT Delhi held that punitive damage being allowed as negative restitution cannot be allowed as business expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act
Explore Sennheiser Electronics India vs Circle – 4 case at ITAT Delhi. Section 115-O rate applies for additional tax on dividends to non-residents, not DTAA rate.
ITAT Delhi held that broadcasting “Live events” does not amount to a work in which copyright subsists i.e., “Live Rights”, is not “copyright” and therefore any payment made thereto can’t be said to be chargeable to tax as royalty under section 9(1)(vi).
