Analysis of ITO vs Balwan Singh (ITAT Delhi) ruling. The case focuses on the amendment effective from 01.04.2023 about source verification for unsecured loans.
Read the analysis of SPI Global US vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) case where sub-contracting charges taxability under India-USA DTAA was contested. Learn about the make available clause and the final decision.
Analysis of the ITAT Delhi order in Radial International vs DCIT case. ITAT directs AO to re-examine PF payment disallowance due to holiday on the due date.
ITAT Delhi held that once a matter has been considered and decided by the ld.CIT(A), the very same issue cannot be the subject matter of consideration at all by PCIT in the revision proceedings either on substantive basis or on protective basis. Accordingly, revision order quashed.
ITAT Delhi held that receipts from disaster recovery playout services and disaster recovery up-linking services are not in the nature of Fee for Technical Service (FTS) as envisaged under Article 12(4)(a) of India-Singapore DTAA.
ITAT Delhi held that addition alleging different rates quoted/ booked for the same area and same property unsustainable as buyers to whom the space have been sold have admitted to have purchased at the price shown and no other cogent or corroborative evidence brought on record.
ITAT Delhi restored the issue to the file of AO with the direction to find out from the relevant PF authorities and ESI authorities about the term ‘every month’ as mentioned in clause 38 of the employees provident fund scheme.
ITAT Delhi orders that absence of a dissolution clause in Trust Deed shouldn’t deny registration u/s 12AA of Income Tax Act in Roop V.K Jain Foundation case.
The assessee is a wholly owned subsidiary of GBT III BV, Netherlands and is engaged in the business of arranging travel for domestic customers within and outside India by facilitating services entailing booking of air tickets, accommodation, cab, conference rooms, catering services, management of corporate events, public relation services etc.
ITAT Delhi held that were sufficient evidence on record that the business activity of the company was still subsisting and the service of the Vice President are indispensable. Accordingly, salary paid to Vice President is allowable u/s. 37(1).
