Analysis of the ITAT Delhi case Gloria Eugenia Rynjah Banerji Vs ITO, focusing on why income tax addition of Rs.2002801 was not deleted despite a technical error by the Assessing Officer.
Explore the ITAT Delhi’s judgment in ACIT vs Rishi Infratach Pvt Ltd case pertaining to Section 68. Learn how the court settled matters related to identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share capital transactions.
ITAT Delhi held that held that benefit of indexed cost of acquisition should be available to assessee based on payments made. Accordingly, AO directed to re-compute gain.
ITAT Delhi held that the cash deposited out of sales cannot be treated as income u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act once the sales are not disputed by the revenue.
ITAT Delhi held that addition by invoking provisions of section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act unjustified as liability reflected as outstanding in books of accounts and there is no evidence that such liability has ceased during the year.
ITAT Delhi held that receipts from background screening provided by the assessee to its customers in India cannot be regarded as Royalty or Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under Article 13 of the India-UK DTAA and hence not taxable in India.
ITAT Delhi held that unadjusted cenvat credit left on closure on manufacturing unit, which cannot be utilised further, is allowable as business expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act
An in-depth analysis of the ITAT Delhi’s order in the case Poonam C/o Sanjeev Anand vs ITO, focusing on the significance of the ruling that assessees should be given a chance to establish non-receipt of statutory notices.
An in-depth analysis of ITAT Delhi’s verdict in the case of Captive Commerce Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT. The tribunal quashes the reassessment order under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for vague reasons.
ITAT Delhi held that towards unexplained money u/s. 69A of the Income Tax Act merely on the basis of unsigned unexecuted draft agreement to sale without any other collaborative evidence is unsustainable in law.
