Delhi High Court held that approval accorded in terms of section 153D of the Income Tax Act in a mechanical manner without application of mind is unsustainable in law. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed and assessment order quashed.
It is well settled that once a statute prescribes a specific period of limitation, the Appellate Authority does not inherently hold any power to condone the delay in filing the appeal by invoking the provisions of Section 5 or 29 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Delhi HC directs Customs to release detained gold, iPhone, and more after failure to issue a Show Cause Notice within six months. Read the full case summary.
Delhi High Court sets aside GST demand order citing non-application of mind, as the tax officer failed to provide a reasoned decision after reviewing objections.
The US Transactions were subject to the Mutual Agreement Procedure between the competent authorities of US and India under Article 27 of the India-US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.
Delhi High Court clarifies Nokia India’s tax reassessment after a notice was issued in the name of a non-existent company, aligning with Supreme Court rulings.
It thus held that the limits that the Board could prescribe would only apply to an initial or an ordinary annual contribution. Any contribution made additionally in discharge of an overarching obligation would thus not be rendered as a disallowable expense.
Delhi High Court sets aside GST demands on Metalax Industries, ruling that parallel proceedings by State GST and DGGI cannot proceed simultaneously.
Delhi High Court held that provisions of section 138(B) of the Customs Act doesn’t provide unfettered right in all cases for cross examination of relevant person. Accordingly, appeals are disposed of.
Delhi High Court held that imposition of condition in case of provisional release of seized goods is discretionary and hence directed furnishing of bank guarantee to the tune of 30% of the differential duty instead of 130%.
