CESTAT Mumbai held that demand alleging undervaluation of imported goods merely on the basis of retracted statements without corroborative evidences is unsustainable in law.
Detailed analysis of the CESTAT Mumbai’s decision to quash a show cause notice with contradictory statements in Maheshwari Transport vs. Commissioner of CE & ST case.
A detailed analysis of the case between Hiranandani Builders and Commissioner of Service Tax-VII in CESTAT Mumbai. Learn how the Tribunal ruled that Revenue has no authority to collect service tax from SEZ Developers.
CESTAT Mumbai held that refund of unutilized Cenvat Credit of input services duly available even if there is export without payment of service tax.
CESTAT Mumbai held that as registration numbers were purposefully omitted, accordingly, the genuineness of the invoices are doubtful, the invoices are categorized as inadmissible document.
An analysis of Hindustan Construction vs. Commissioner of Service Tax case, covering service tax on corporate guarantees and credit protection fees.
CESTAT Mumbai dismisses Revenue’s application for review against DHL Lemuir Logistics, criticizes incorrect factual representation.
CESTAT Mumbai held that demand of service tax on reimbursement of expenditure by the ship owner goes beyond the mandate of Section 67 the Finance Act, 1994. Accordingly, demand of service tax confirmed u/r 5 doesn’t survive as rule 5 itself has been held to be ultra vires of section 67.
Analysis of CESTAT Mumbai case between CGST & CE and Modern Road Makers Pvt. Ltd., focusing on service tax demand based on ST-3 and ITR mismatch.
CESTAT set aside impugned order and held that the assessee is not receiving penal interest and bouncing charges as a consideration for tolerating an act. Thus, service tax cannot be demanded.
