The recent ruling from the Calcutta High Court in the case of Madalyns Tea Enterprise Vs Senior Joint Commissioner provides key insights into the issue of smuggling and bogus E-Way Bills. Learn about the Court’s decision on releasing a detained tea consignment amidst allegations of poppy seed smuggling.
Calcutta HC dismisses writ petition challenging order accusing petitioner of benefiting from unaccounted money through accommodation entries
In a recent judgement, the Calcutta High Court ordered the release of detained tea consignment belonging to Radha Tea Merchant. The case involved smuggled poppy seeds but found no evidence of the supplier’s involvement. Discover more about this case.
Dive into the case of Jyote Motors Bengal Pvt. Ltd. v. Additional Director, DGGI, where the Calcutta High Court adjudicates on the constitutional validity of Section 16(4) of the CGST Act.
Gain insights into the landmark ruling by the Calcutta High Court in SKP Infrarealty Pvt Ltd. & Anr vs Union of India case, regarding non-participation in income tax proceedings and the principle of natural justice.
Calcutta High Court, in the case of Liakhat Ali Mallick v. State of West Bengal, set aside the order requiring the assessee to make a pre-deposit of 20% of the interest liability. Gain insights into the ruling and its implications for GST cases.
Calcutta High Court has directed authorities to release a tea consignment that was detained due to suspicions regarding a bogus E-Way Bill. The case entailed a mix-up with smuggled poppy seeds mislabeled as Ramdana seeds.
In Ramji Jaiswal & Anr Vs State Tax Officer, Calcutta High Court waives penalty for transportation of goods with an expired E-way bill, citing lack of intention to evade tax.
The Calcutta High Court overturned a tax assessment order following a technical issue with the Income Tax Portal that prevented a timely objection.
Calcutta High Court rules that initiation of fresh proceedings against an entity under CIRP is barred by IBC Section 238, quashing IT department’s order and subsequent actions against MSP Metallics Limited.