She has also tried to demonstrate that at the time of JDA, the land which was part of the stock-in-trade was contributed under JDA for the construction of residential apartments. Therefore, the profit earned on sale of flat would be a business profit.
Vogue Vestures Pvt. Ltd. Vs Dy. CIT (ITAT Bangalore) This issue was now covered by the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of CIT v. Mark Auto Industries Ltd (2013) 358 ITR 43 (P&H). wherein the High court held that in absence of any requirements in law for making deduction of […]
Expenditure for expansion of existing business in terms of new beds and services and aid in raising equity funds approximately 100 crores from interested investors to finance its expansion plan is certainly a revenue expenditure and be allowed as deduction under section 37 of the Act.
M/s. Enchanting Travels Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Income Tax Officer (ITAT Bangalore) We find that TPO has already taken the total 10 comparables and with respect to 8 comparables, assessee has no objections. With respect to Kerala Travels Interserve Ltd., we have carefully perused its financial statements and we find the main revenue is from different […]
ITO Vs Arshia Basith (ITAT Bangalore) we find that the assessment year in this appeal is 2014-15 and the provision in section 54F comes w.e.f. 01.04.2015 according to which it was clarified that the residential house is to be acquired only in India meaning thereby before this amendment it was not clear as to whether […]
ITAT opined that the assessee derived advantage by deferring its income to the extent of excess warranty provision to subsequent years. Therefore, such excess provision cannot be allowed as a deduction as it cannot be said to be reliable.
DCIT Vs M/s. Prestige Garden Estates Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Bangalore) Conclusion: Deduction was allowable under section 36(1)(iii) on interest on borrowing to pay earnest money deposits (EMD) to purchase properties being lands, flats, etc. as the same was for purpose of assessee’s business of acquiring properties. Held: In the present case, assessee-company was engaged mainly […]
As far as the deduction u/s. 54F of the Act on the question whether if under a JDA multiple flats are given to the owner whether deduction u/s.54F of the Act can be given, the decision of the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka and the other decision cited before us supports the plea of the […]
M/s. Royal Challenger Sports Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT Assessee challenges the addition on account of contribution made to Cricket Academy of Rs.45 lakhs holding it to be capital expenditure. The assessee made a contribution of Rs.45 lakhs to Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) for the purpose of creating a cricket academy. The assessee was also a Franchisee of BCCI-IPL, which […]
DCIT Vs M/s. Teleradiology Solutions P. Ltd. (ITAT Bangalore) The learned Counsel for the assessee has contended that it is a business arrangement between the assessee and the consultants/doctors. If the assessee does not pay the licence fee on behalf of the doctors, he has to compensate the doctors by making additional payment for the services. […]
