In the instant case, ITAT allows the assessee to withdrawn the appeal filed for challenging the transfer pricing adjustment due to Advance pricing agreement filed u/s 92CC of the Income tax Act.
Jairam G Kimmane Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) In the present case, the claim of the Assessee that agricultural operations were carried out over the property and the property was actually used for agricultural purpose was sought to be established by relying on the classification of the property in revenue records. The Revenue contends that there […]
ABB AB C/o ABB India Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Assessing Officer first has to examine whether the amounts received are off shore supply contracts by the assessee were received outside the country. The learned Authorized Representative submitted that the assessee company has offered the income on on shore supply contracts. Since, the off shore […]
Search conducted on the basis of warrant of authorization issued in the name of non-existing entity and consequent assessment framed under section 243(3) read with section 153A were bad in law being nullity in the eyes of law.
whether the 1st proviso of section 92C(4) is triggered when the income computation for deduction u/s 10AA is enhanced only in the computation of income and no such entries are made in the books of account?
Akarsh Residence Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) As per the facts noted by learned CIT(A) in the relevant paras of his order as reproduced above, it comes out that search was carried out in the case of M/s. Adarsh Developers and incriminating documents were found and seized in the course of search and those […]
Disallowance of assessee’s claim for deduction under section 54F on the ground of assessee holding one more residential property in joint name along with his wife, could not be sustained as although in purchase deed, name of assessee was also there along with name of wife and purchase consideration of second residential property was paid by her out of joint/her individual bank account however, assessee’s wife was having sufficient own funds in that joint bank account received as her share in sale proceeds of shares.
The issue under consideration is whether the architectural services provided to Singapore Entity taxable at 10% or 20% when the benefit of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) is available?
The issue under consideration is whether the second extension of stay of demand against ITAT appeal will be allowed to the assessee?
The issue under consideration is whether the deduction u/s 80P is allowed against the bonus received by the Co-operative Society from M/s. Karnataka Co-operative Milk Producers’ Federation (KMF)?
