ITAT Bangalore held that excess premium paid by the assessee on redemption of preference shares cannot be taxed as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(d) or section 2(22)(e) and hence deleted the addition.
While holding that the premium on redemption of preference shares was exigible to tax under the head Income from Capital Gains, the ITAT held that the revenue authorities were not justified in making the additions to the assessees income on the ground of notional premium receivable on preference shares.
ITAT Bangalore held that in the absence of no written agreement exists between the assessee and its AE requiring the assessee to incur advertisement, marketing and promotion (AMP) expenses, the same cannot be regarded as an international transaction at all and hence TP adjustment not sustainable
ITAT Bangalore held that expression expenditure also includes loss and therefore the difference between the price at which the shares are issued to the employees and the market value of the shares would be expenditure incurred for section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act
As entire amount is debited to the Profit and Loss account and accounted in the regular books of accounts, the same cannot be disallowed under Section 69C
In our opinion, the assessee is having no explanation with regard to generation of scraps and sale of the same. In our opinion, it is only a make-believe story so as to account the unaccounted cash generation by assessee. In view of this, we do not find any merit in the argument of the learned Counsel for the assessee.
ITAT Bangalore Held that declared additional income offered to tax as business income is sustainable when the only source of income is business income. Hence, the provisions of section 115BBE cannot be invoked to tax the income as ‘deemed income’.
Fee u/s. 234E for filing TDS returns belatedly could not be levied prior to 01/06/2015 as there was no machinery provision of sec. 200A .
ITAT Bangalore held that deletion of unexplained investment without verifying the reflection thereof in the books of accounts and also without verifying consolidated statement of accounts is untenable in law. Matter remanded to verify the books of accounts
Ujjivan Small Finance Bank Vs ADIT (ITAT Bangalore) In this case The CIT(A) had denied the benefit of lower tax rate u/s 115BAA of the I.T. Act for the reason that the assessee has not filed the return of income on or before the due date specified u/s 139(1) of the I.T. Act. In this […]
