Read about the Andhra Pradesh High Court’s decision to allow a writ petition challenging a penalty order that violated the principles of natural justice. Get a comprehensive analysis of the case and its implications.
Andhra Pradesh High Court held that motor vehicles deployed to Central Deposit Yard Premises are not subject to Motor Vehicle Tax and are entitled to get exemption as contemplated in Motor Vehicles Act.
Held that the petitioner is plying the vehicles in the Central Deposit Yard premises itself proves that the premises does not fall under the definition of ‘public place’ as under Section 2 sub Section (34) of the Act. Hence, motor vehicle tax not leviable.
In the case of Kalpataru Project International Ltd Vs Union of India, the Andhra Pradesh High Court examines the jurisdiction issue regarding a notice proposing revision of VAT refund. Stay of proceedings is granted until further orders. Get the full judgment and analysis in this article.
Andhra Pradesh High Court held that issuance of notice in Form GST ASMT-10 under rule 99 of A.P. Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 read with Section 61 of A.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 by Deputy Commissioner without authorization of Chief Commissioner lacks authorization and hence liable to be quashed.
Andhra Pradesh High Court held that as the petitioner is a Chartered Accountant by profession and it is his first offence and he has been in jail since long. Accordingly, continuance incarceration of the petitioner is not justified. Hence, bail granted.
Andhra Pradesh High Court held that turnover of same assessee in different states cannot be assessed by department of one State. Accordingly, turnover relating to bus business for the States of Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Tamilnadu and Puducherry needs to be assessed separately.
Andhra Pradesh High Court held that department cannot pass order under section 5 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PML Act) without recording of proper reasons. Accordingly, the order attaching the accounts is set aside.
Section 70 (1) of GST act only says that the proper officer shall have the power to summon any person whose attendance is considered necessary either to give evidence or to produce a document or any other thing in the enquiry and nothing more.
Y Screens Entertainment (India) Ltd Vs Government of AP (Andhra Pradesh HC) Issue- 3rd respondent cancelled the GST Registration of the petitioner for non filing of returns for a period of six months. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner filed appeal before the 2nd respondent and vide order in Special Appeal which was dismissed on the ground that […]
