Learn about the DCIT vs Umang Hiralal Thakkar case at ITAT Ahmedabad regarding filing returns under section 139(1) for claiming deduction under section 80IB. Get detailed insights and analysis.
ITAT Mumbai held that assessment order passed without satisfying mandatory provisions of section 92CA and CBDT instruction no. 3 of 2016 is order falling within the meaning of erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Hence, revisional jurisdiction u/s. 263 of the Income Tax Act rightly invoked.
ITAT Delhi’s order on Trident Towers Pvt. Ltd vs ACIT addresses the deletion of addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, citing submission of requisite documents.
New Delhi ITAT rules that no addition can be made under Sec 69 if the difference in stock found during survey and recorded in books is reconciled. Detailed analysis of Ultimate Creations Vs ACIT.
Chandigarh ITAT ruled interest income from cooperative bank eligible for deduction under Sec 80P(2)(d). Detailed analysis of the case.
There is no bar on appellate authority to entertain additional claim during assessment proceedings in absence of any statutory provisions.
Delve into the Kolkata ITAT’s ruling regarding Form No. 10AB applications under section 12A(1)(ac)(i) for registration, analyzing its impact on Santiniketan Sishutirtha vs CIT (Exemptions).
Delhi ITAT rules on the filing of Form 10CCB before due date per Sec 139(1). Analysis of Sanjay Kukreja vs ACIT case & its impact on deduction u/s 80-IA.
In Bharat Agro Industries Vs DCIT, New Delhi ITAT questions the logic of treating sales as bogus when purchases are genuine and stock is accepted.
New Delhi ITAT explains that Explanation 3 to Sec 147 can’t justify additions unrelated to reasons for reopening. Read the detailed analysis.
