It is also noteworthy that the learned Departmental Representative (DR), during the hearing, did not point out any material differences between the facts of the present case and those of the earlier assessment years.
ITAT Mumbai overturns CIT(A)’s order, stating the appellate authority lacks power to set aside assessments. The tribunal directed the CIT(A) to re-adjudicate the case after obtaining a remand report from the Assessing Officer.
ITAT Mumbai held that that reimbursement of expenses at cost is not taxable as fees for technical services since there is no element of income attached to the transaction. Accordingly, revenue’s appeal dismissed.
ITAT Jaipur remands Jai Prakash Sharma’s case for fresh hearing after CIT(A) added ₹12,06,189 as undisclosed income due to non-compliance in earlier proceedings.
ITAT Mumbai rules that cooperative societies can claim deductions under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest earned from cooperative banks, overturning prior disallowance.
ITAT Cuttack held that revisionary proceedings under section 263 of the Income Tax Act is liable to be quashed since assessee is entitled for exemption u/s. 11 and hence twin conditions are not satisfied in as much as there is no loss of revenue.
ITAT Mumbai remands Rotary Charity Trust’s 80G approval case due to an inadvertent section error in Form 10AB. Matter sent back for reconsideration.
ITAT Ranchi permits Gajanand Bhalotia to withdraw appeal as he opts for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, with an option for restoration if settlement fails.
ITAT Chennai overturns AO’s Rs.53.02 lakh addition to J.K. Jewel Craft’s income, ruling that suspicion alone cannot justify unexplained investment during demonetization.
Visakhapatnam ITAT allowed a Section 54F capital gains exemption, even though the assessee didn’t deposit the sale proceeds in a specified account. The tribunal cited beneficial interpretation of the provision and the assessee’s investment in a new property.
