ITAT Bangalore remands case for a fresh TP study, directing TPO to assess the applicability of MAP-determined ALP to transactions with non-US Associated Enterprises.
Purna Purshottam Exports Vs PCIT (Central) (ITAT Mumbai) Summary: The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled in favor of Purna Purshottam Exports, stating that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) cannot invoke Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, if the Assessing Officer (AO) has already conducted a thorough […]
ITAT Chennai allows reassessment of ₹54.70 lakh cash deposits during demonetization, granting the assessee another opportunity subject to a ₹5,000 cost payment.
ITAT Kolkata dismisses Nikhil Commosales Pvt. Ltd.’s appeal, permitting revival if the assessee’s application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024 is unsuccessful.
Claim of the assessee for deduction for education cess was on a bonafide belief that it was allowable expenditure u/s. 37(1) and hence, the same was not a case for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s. 270A.
Analysis of Section 263 proceedings in a case involving a builder and developer. Learn why the PCIT directed reassessment for AY 2016–17 and key judicial observations.
Learn how the PCIT correctly invoked Section 263 of the Income Tax Act due to the AO’s misapplication of law in taxing Stamp Duty Valuation and Unexplained Investment. Explore detailed analysis of Section 56(2)(x), Section 69, and key judicial precedents.
In the matter abovementioned ITAT Banglore held that interest earned by the assessee from the co-operative banks/commercial bank is considered under the head income from other sources, relief to be granted to the assessee u/s 57 in accordance with law.
ITAT Pune cancels penalty imposed on Balbir Kaur Birdie for non-compliance with tax notices, citing reasonable cause due to COVID-19 and technical issues.
ITAT Ahmedabad upholds ₹4.64 crore addition under Section 69A due to unexplained bank transactions and lack of cooperation from the assessee in tax proceedings.