Excise Duty Act, Rules Articles News Notification Circulars Instructions. Input Credit, Cenvat, Duty Rate, SSI Exemption, Excise on Jewellery,Excise on Garment
Excise Duty : The Supreme Court upholds CENVAT credit for telecom infrastructure, ruling in favor of telecom operators on towers and shelters....
Excise Duty : The MOOWR scheme offers deferred duties, export benefits, and operational ease for manufacturers in India, aiding growth but facin...
Excise Duty : Understand windfall tax, imposed on oil and gas companies due to unforeseen profit gains. Learn its implications and why India int...
Excise Duty : Explore the legal intricacies of challenging the Excise Department's notice for a public limited company's change in management vi...
Excise Duty : Explore the Madras High Courts decision in India Cement Limited v. Commissioner of Customs, allowing Cenvat credit for electricity...
Excise Duty : Govt clarifies tax increase on tobacco products, citing changes in excise duty on cigarettes and GST rules. Revenue funds overall ...
Excise Duty : Supreme Court admits Ecoboard Industries Ltd.'s appeal on excise duty for intermediate products, questioning Tribunal's duty impo...
Excise Duty : Key changes in excise duty and Clean Environment Cess under Finance (No. 2) Bill, 2024, including extended deadlines and exemption...
Excise Duty : Case Title: M/s. Marwadi Shares and Finance Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors.; Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 27124/2023; Dat...
Excise Duty : CBIC, under the Ministry of Finance, seeks feedback on the proposed Central Excise Bill 2024. Stakeholders can submit suggestions ...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Chennai order in Steel Authority of India Ltd. vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise regarding irregular CENVAT credit, ...
Excise Duty : Kerala High Court dismissed a tax appeal for non-compliance with pre-deposit requirements under Section 35F of the Central Excise ...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Delhi held that duty demand on Student Almanac and teacher planner is uphold, however, extended period of limitation is not...
Excise Duty : CESTAT rules definitions and valuation mechanisms under central excise law must be applied strictly in accordance with its own sta...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Mumbai rules that VAT incentives under Goa’s NPV scheme are not part of the assessable value for excise duty. Demand agai...
Excise Duty : CBIC sets up interim boards for settlement across Delhi, Kolkata, Mumbai, and Chennai, appointing principal chief commissioners an...
Excise Duty : CBIC assigns post-GST legacy excise and service tax appeals to designated officers for adjudication. Details available in attached...
Excise Duty : CBIC assigns Central Excise Officers to handle appeals filed on or after July 1, 2017, related to pre-GST Central Excise and Servi...
Excise Duty : Four Interim Boards for Settlement under Central Excise Act established in Delhi, Kolkata, Mumbai, and Chennai by CBIC notificatio...
Excise Duty : Indian government revises central excise duty on petrol to Rs. 13/litre and diesel to Rs. 10/litre, effective April 8, 2025....
Explore the Kanade Anand Udyog vs. CCE Thane case, highlighting the denial of Cenvat credit on capital goods. Detailed analysis and verdict discussed.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that suo moto re-credit duly allowable as eligibility of cenvat credit on outward transportation has attained finality and decided in favour of the appellant.
CESTAT Mumbai held that in case of premature availment of cenvat credit on capital goods the recovery proceedings under rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (CCR, 2004) would not sustain and only interest liability will arise.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that services related to pollution control of the factory is covered within the term ‘input services’ as per rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and hence eligible for cenvat credit.
CESTAT Mumbai held that prior to amendment i.e. till 31.03.2008 CENVAT Credit on outward transportation from the ‘place of removal’ is admissible. As entire period of dispute is pre-amendment, CENVAT Credit available and demand unsustainable.
CESTAT Kolkata held that penalty under rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules 2002 leviable as involvement in clandestine manufacture and clearance is well established.
No excise duty was leviable under section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on the allegation of illicit clearing as the department had miserably failed to substantiate the allegation of clandestine manufacture and clearance by any tangible or corroborative evidence
Excise duty demand of approximately 24 crores against Volkswagen India was quashed on the amount recovered as liquidated damages on the ground of non-violation of Rule 6 of the Central Excise Rules,2002 and in the event of rejection of the invoice value as transaction value, it was not open to the adjudicating authority to re-determine value without recourse to Rule 6 of Central Excise Rules.
Penalty under Rule 26 was justified on the proof that there were sufficient evidences adduced to allege clandestine removal and appellant had in his statement recorded under section 14 while giving the details of working of the unit had admitted that he was actively involved in the working of the unit.
Supreme Court held that Notification No. 2 of 2006 dated 01.03.2006 didn’t specify the goods falling under CET SH 2403 9930, i.e., ‘zarda/jarda scented tobacco’, but it covers the goods falling under CET SH 2403 9910 i.e., ‘chewing tobacco’.
