This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Mutual Fund Promotion and Initial Public Offer expense allowed as business expense
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- CIT Vs Sahara Asset Management Company Pvt. Ltd (Madras High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2005-06
- Courts
- All High Courts, Madras High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
CIT Vs Sahara Asset Management Company Pvt. Ltd (Madras High Court)
Madras High Court held that ITAT rightly deleted the addition on account of Mutual Fund Promotion Expenditure and Initial Public Offer Expenditure since the said expenses are incurred wholly for the purpose of business and hence the same are allowable expense.
Facts- The assessee is an asset management company acting as fund manager, managing mutual fund schemes. For the Assessment Year 2005-06, assessee had claimed mutual fund promotion expenditure and initial public offer expenditure. AO held that the assessee company is a f...






