Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs Sahara Asset Management Company Pvt. Ltd (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 2005-06
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
CIT Vs Sahara Asset Management Company Pvt. Ltd (Madras High Court) Madras High Court held that ITAT rightly deleted the addition on account of Mutual Fund Promotion Expenditure and Initial Public Offer Expenditure since the said expenses are incurred wholly for the purpose of business and hence the same are allowable expense. Facts- The assessee is an asset management company acting as fund manager, managing mutual fund schemes. For the Assessment Year 2005-06, assessee had claimed mutual fund promotion expenditure and initial public offer expenditure. AO held that the assessee company is a f...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930