This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Service Tax not payable on refundable security deposits from customers
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ATS Township Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner Central GST (CESTAT Allahabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Allahabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
ATS Township Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner Central GST (CESTAT Allahabad)
The issue relates to inclusion of the amount collected by the appellant as Interest Free Maintenance Security (IFMS). Revenue’s contention is that the said collected amount would fall under the category of ‘Management Maintenance and Repair Services’ and would be liable to service tax separately.
We note that the said amount collected by the appellant from the flat owners is towards the security for the purpose of maintenance of the building and to cover the eventual default made by any of the flat owners for payment o...




