Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Sukhdev Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 7849/Del/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/05/2021
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Shri Sukhdev Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)

ITAT Delhi as regards contention of notice not properly serviced held that as per postal authorities explanation the assessee has refused to take notice and such refusal to take a notice is a good service.

Facts-

The case of the assessee was selected on the basis of AIR information of cash deposited in the bank account of the assessee. Assessee deposited Rs.36,90,000/- in the savings bank account which was received by the assessee from sale of agricultural land and other agricultural income as well as sale proceeds. The Assessing Officer issued notice to the assessee vide notice u/s. 147 and 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) dated 16.05.2011. As per the assessment order the notice was returned back with the postal remark that the same was not accepted. Therefore, the Assessing Officer passed assessment order under Section 144 of the Act treating the cash transaction amounting to Rs.36,90,000/- as unexplained deposit and treated the same as income under Section 69A and made addition accordingly.

Being aggrieved by the assessment order the assessee filed appeal before the CIT (Appeals). The CIT (Appeals) partially allowed the appeal of the assessee.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031