Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Goldmohur Design And Apparel Park Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Goldmohur Design And Apparel Park Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Form 26AS Mismatch Alone Not Conclusive: Mumbai ITAT Orders Verification to Avoid Double Taxation The Mumbai Bench of the ITAT allowed the appeal of Goldmohur Design and Apparel Park Ltd. (AY 2018-19) for statistical purposes by setting aside additions made solely on the basis of Form 26AS mismatches and restoring the issues to the Assessing Officer for factual verification. The additions related to interest income (₹14.39 lakh) and sale of services (₹23.07 lakh) were confirmed by the CIT(A) primarily due to lack of corroborat...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Missing Safety Certificates Justified Section 12AB Registration Rejection: Bengaluru ITAT Absence of Irrevocability Clause Alone No Ground to Deny Section 12AB Registration: ITAT Mumbai Sections 234B & 234C Interest Excluded from Tax Effect for Appeal Limit: ITAT Mumbai Earlier Loan Repayment via Bank Not Taxable Under Section 68: ITAT Mumbai Ad Hoc Commission Cap Without Comparables Invalid; Section 40A(2)(b) Inapplicable: Bengaluru ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031