The Delhi High Court ruled that Show Cause Notices issued on 30 November 2024 for FY 2020–21 were within limitation under Section 73(2) of the CGST Act. The Court treated December, January, and February as the relevant three calendar months before the final order date.
The ITAT ruled that accepted sales necessarily imply corresponding purchases, even if sourced through the grey market. The addition was therefore restricted to estimated profit instead of the full purchase amount.
The Gujarat High Court ruled that Input Tax Credit cannot be claimed unless the supplier has actually paid tax to the Government under Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act. The Court held that ITC remains a conditional statutory benefit and refused to create a bona fide purchaser exception.
The Tribunal held that the AO wrongly aggregated actual property value and stamp duty valuation of the same transaction to invoke extended limitation under Section 149(1)(b). The reassessment notice for AY 2015-16 was declared time-barred and without jurisdiction.
GSTN has implemented automated interest computation through the Tax Liability Break-up mechanism in GSTR-3B to identify delayed tax payments relating to earlier periods. The update shifts GST compliance from manual assessment to system-driven validation based on invoice dates, reporting periods, and payment timelines.
The CESTAT Delhi held that polyester knitted fabric containing a small percentage of spandex could not be treated as mis-declared goods. The Tribunal ruled that such minor composition variation did not justify confiscation under the Customs Act.
For export transactions occurring before the Finance Act, 2022 amendment, the determination of iron ore fines (Fe content) must be done on a Wet Metric Tonne (WMT) basis, rejecting the Dry Metric Tonne (DMT) method adopted by the Adjudicating Authority.
The Mumbai ITAT held that no separate addition for alleged bogus purchases can be made where the assessee has already disclosed a higher gross profit on disputed transactions. The Tribunal relied on Bombay High Court rulings limiting additions only to differential GP.
The ITAT Delhi held that contractual receipts reflected in the PAN of a dissolved partnership firm could not be taxed again when they were already disclosed in the proprietorship concern of the surviving partner. The Tribunal ruled that such addition would amount to double taxation.
NCLT Kochi held that insolvency proceedings can simultaneously continue against both the principal borrower and corporate guarantor under the IBC. The Tribunal admitted Axis Bank’s Section 7 petition after finding debt and default established.
