NCLAT Delhi closes the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] of corporate debtor since construction of flats is completed and possession is handed over to all the claimant homebuyers and there is no claimant left.
CESTAT Chandigarh held that CENVAT Credit of input services i.e. insurance and authorized service station cannot be denied as services are availed before 01.04.2011 and used for furtherance of business.
Madras High Court held that cancellation of GST registration for non-compliance with relevant provision of GST Act not justified since the reason of slowdown in business is genuine. Accordingly, restoration of GST registration ordered.
Madras High Court held that filing of a fresh refund claim in terms of section 27 (1-B) of the Customs Act not required as refund claim was duly filed within limitation of one year from the date of import. Accordingly, writ of petitioner stands allowed.
AO was directed to consider the original return while deciding the case involving disallowance of excess deductions and house property loss claimed in revised returns for Assessment Year (AY) 2020-21 as the revised return had been filed by the assessee based on the wrong guidance of the tax advisors and had been brought to the notice of the AO.
Delhi High Court held that exemption from Basic Customs Duty [BCD] admissible in case of WAPs import employing either Multiple Input/ Multiple Output (MIMO) or Long Term Evolution (LTE) standards prior to amendment brought vide Finance Act, 2021.
Understand Interest Rate Parity (IRP) and Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) in the context of the Indian economy. Learn why these theories deviate and their corporate implications.
ITAT Delhi held that circle rate couldn’t be applied as the property was sold under distress. Accordingly, matter remanded back to AO to determine fair market value of property taking into consideration that the sale was under distress.
Learn about India’s Employment Linked Incentive (ELI) Scheme. Understand the eligibility, three sub-schemes, and benefits for both employees and employers.
The ITAT Hyderabad ruled that an adjustment under Section 50C is not a prima facie issue when title and valuation are disputed, mandating a DVO referral.
