Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Muthoot Fincorp Limited Vs JCIT (ITAT Cochin)
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Muthoot Fincorp Limited Vs JCIT (ITAT Cochin) ITAT Cochin dismissed Muthoot Fincorp’s appeal, holding that payments under a 5-year consultancy agreement with its group company were part of a composite contract. TDS must be deducted on the full amount including reimbursements, and the second proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) is not retrospective; In Muthoot Fincorp Limited vs JCIT, ITAT Cochin upheld the disallowance of ₹6.01 crore, rejecting the claim that reimbursements were exempt from TDS. The Tribunal ruled that TDS applies on gross contractual payments, following settled SC precedents; M...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031