The Competition Commission of India (CCI) seeks feedback on the draft regulations for determining turnover or income. Share your comments from 22.12.2023 to 12.01.2024.
Explore EPFO’s SOP for freezing and de-freezing MIDs, UANs, and Establishments to safeguard funds, verify genuineness, and prevent fraud. Learn the procedure and timelines.
Explore the latest GST Council Newsletter – Issue 56, covering robust growth, amnesty for appeals, and biometric Aadhaar authentication. Stay informed on key updates.
Stay informed with the December 2023 edition of GST Case Law Compendium. Explore detailed analyses of crucial cases, including penalties, transportation disclosure, recovery proceedings, fair hearing rights, cash seizures, and more.
Explore the case of Pr. CIT vs Ansal Properties: Penalty notice invalidated due to ambiguity in specifying Section 271(1)(c) limb for penalty proceedings.
Assessee was approached by Financial Creditor of FR Tech Innovations Private Limited (CD) for proposing the name of assessee as IRP in the company petition to be filed by the Financial Creditor under Section 7 of IBC, 2016 in the NCLT, Mumbai Bench by the FR Tech Innovations Private Limited.
Explore the Karnataka High Court’s ruling on penalty notices under Income Tax Act in CIT vs SSA’s Emerald Meadows. Learn about specificity requirements and key findings.
Delhi High Court’s ruling in Pr. CIT vs Sahara India Life Insurance Co. clarifies Section 44, emphasizes specificity in penalty notices under Section 271(1)(c).
Since the legislature vested the discretion to extend the timeframe solely in the AO, he could not have abdicated that function and confined his role to only making a recommendation to the CIT. CIT had no role in extending the timeframe as the AO was in seisin of the assessment proceedings.
Karnataka High Court’s landmark judgment: Accused not entitled to bail solely on co-accused’s release. Detailed analysis on individual acts and legal principles.
