INSTRUCTION NO-2/2008, Dated: February 22, 2008 A. The procedure will apply to assessees engaged in the business of manufacturing and/or trading of diamonds (referred to below as such business). B. If an assessee has shown a sum equal to or higher than 6% of his total turnover from such business as his income under the head ‘profits and gains of business or profession’ for a particular assessment year, the Assessing Officer shall accept his trading results.
INSTRUCTION NO. 1/2008, DATED 9-1-2008 Your attention is drawn to the guidelines for selection of cases under scrutiny for the F. Y. 2007-08 under which claim of refund of Rs. 5 lakhs or above is one of the criteria for compulsory scrutiny. Such cases were to be selected for scrutiny by CASS in all the networked stations and manually in non-networked stations.
Instruction No. 5 dated 16-7-2007- The Board has also decided that cases where the question of law involved or raised in appeal is/are of a recurring nature to be decided by the Court, should be separately considered on merits without being hindered by the monetary limits. Subject to paragraphs 2 and 3 above, the Instruction No. 979, dated 27-3-2000 clarified subsequently by Instruction No. 985, dated 29-6-2000 and Instruction No. 2/2005, dated 24-10-2005, will continue to govern the decision for filing of departmental appeals.
It has also been brought to notice of the Board that in some cases, the address of transacting parties given in AIRs is not complete. Sub-para (f) of para 10 of above-mentioned instruction outlines the procedure to be followed in case the assessee is not traceable. It may be because of incomplete address or change in address. All efforts should be made to trace the assessee in accordance with the procedure outlined in said sub-para. However, it should be ensured that there is valid service of notice. Further if, because of time taken in tracing the assessee, no time is available for issue of notice under section 142(1) and for making the assessment up to 31-12-2007, notice may be issued under section 148 after 31-12-2007.
The programme of Local Audit is communicated by the Revenue Audit at least one month before the Local Audit. All co-operation & assistance should be extended to the Revenue Audit Party (RAP) during the audit process. The records requisitioned by the RAP should be entered in the ‘Register’ maintained for this purpose and complete records should be made available.
It has been decided to allow Indian Nationals undertaking visit abroad to buy from duty free shops at International Airports at India in Indian Rupees goods worth Rupees 5000/-(Five thousand only) per passenger per visit subject to following safeguard,-
Notification No. 29/2005- Central Excise, dated the 31st May, 2005, has been issued so as to exempt specified goods for the manufacture of rotor blades for wind operated electricity generators from the duty of excise specified under the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, subject to certification by Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy Sources.
Gautam Ray Joint Secretary (TRU) Tel. No. 23092687 D.O. F.No. B-1/4/2005-TRU New Delhi, dated the 2nd May, 2005 Dear Commissioner While moving the Finance Bill, 2005 in the Lok Sabha for passing, the Finance Minister has effected some changes in customs and excise duties and service tax. 2. The changes made in the customs and […]
Instruction No: 20/2003 Issue of Appellate Order Within 15 days of Last Hearing The Board has given serious consideration to the delay in passing/issue of the appellate orders by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), much after the last day of the hearing/receipt of written submission. This results in hardship to the assessee and hampers in smooth interface with assessee.
In partial modification of earlier instructions on the subject, the Board have revised the prescribed monetary ceilings for write-off of irrecoverable dues of Direct Taxes by the various income-tax authorities. At the same time, the Board have reviewed and modified the existing structure of the Committees for recommending write-off. The revised procedure in this regard would be as follows:
