Goods and Services Tax : Summary of recent GST High Court decisions on refund validity, tax evasion penalties, provisional attachment limits, ITC denial, a...
Goods and Services Tax : Supreme Court clarifies ITC eligibility for construction under GST in Safari Retreats case, addressing "plant" definition, functio...
Income Tax : Below is a curated list of the most influential and frequently cited landmark judgments under the ITA, focusing on their practical...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court rules Urdu can be used on public signboards, clarifying it is not tied to any religion and has equal status with Mar...
Corporate Law : SC judgment: Anticipatory bail should be granted sparingly in economic offences, especially for those evading legal processes. Acc...
Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...
Income Tax : Government addresses Supreme Court judgment on tax exemptions for clergy and its implications on Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) u...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court rejects regularisation of illegal constructions, irrespective of occupancy or investments, and calls for action agai...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court Collegium recommends three advocates—Ajay Digpaul, Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, and Shwetasree Majumder—for ...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that resolution plan by Successful Resolution Application i.e. Piramal Capital and Housing Limited for Dewan Ho...
Corporate Law : SC sets framework distinguishing copyright from design protection for industrial drawings, impacting IP law. Clarifies Section 15(...
Income Tax : SC mandates reporting of cash transactions over ₹2L under Section 269ST, directing courts, IT authorities, and registrars to ens...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court rules overruling judgments under NDPS Act are retrospective. Clarifies scope of Section 8, Schedule I & impact on pa...
Income Tax : Supreme Court judgment: Income Tax Commissioners cannot routinely remand cases if Assessing Officer finds no additions after inqui...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : No restrictions on joint bank accounts or nominations for the queer community, as clarified by the Supreme Court and RBI in August...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court of India introduces new procedures for case adjournments effective 14th February 2024, detailing strict guidelines a...
Corporate Law : Explore the updated FAQs on the implementation of the EPFO judgment dated 04.11.2022. Understand proof requirements, pension compu...
Income Tax : Comprehensive guide on CBDT's directives for AOs concerning the Abhisar Buildwell Supreme Court verdict. Dive into its implication...
Any actions that could endanger the natural ecosystem and the life, health, and safety of all living things are prohibited by environmental law.
No penalty is envisaged under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act for non-deduction and for belated remittance /payment/deposit of the TDS.
Tribunal Decision determining ALP can be challenged on grounds of perversity & non observance of transfer pricing rules in individual cases
PCIT Vs Abhisar Buildwell P Ltd (Supreme Court of India) Revenue files MA in SC seeking clarification regarding applicability of judgement in the light of provisions of Section 150 of IT Act 1961 After the judgement of Supreme Court in the case of Abhisar Buildwell Pvt ltd was announced on 24th April, 2023, the Income-tax […]
SC set aside the order passed by the High Court imposing a condition of deposit while granting bail to the appellant therein.
Core issue involved in the appeals is the scope of assessment u/s 153A. question posed for consideration is, as to whether in respect of completed assessments/unabated assessments, whether the jurisdiction of AO to make assessment is confined to incriminating material found during the course of search u/s 132 or requisition u/s 132A or not,
As a consequence, any loss incurred by way of an expenditure by an assessee for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law is not deductible in terms of Explanation 1 to Section 37 of the Act.
In respect of completed/unabated assessments, no addition can be made in absence of any incriminating material found during search: SC
In this case a dispute regarding the induction of tenant by the Wakf Board, the Supreme Court held that payment of rent by grandfather or great grandfather cannot raise the presumption that the business being carried on is a joint family business.
Non levy of Anti Dumping duty is causing grave irreparable injury and prejudice to the Indian Manufactures on a daily basis.
