Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Goods and Services Tax : Bombay HC rules GST on developer rights under a development agreement does not fall under reverse charge as per Entry 5B of Notifi...
Corporate Law : Allahabad HC: Anticipatory bail under BNSS is applicable in Gangsters Act cases initiated before July 1, 2024, if arrest apprehens...
Goods and Services Tax : Kerala HC rules GST on services by clubs to members as unconstitutional, citing violation of mutuality principle and lack of legis...
Corporate Law : It is definitely most refreshing, most reassuring and so also certainly most reinvigorating to learn that while striking the right...
Corporate Law : Delhi HC fined BJP’s Shazia Ilmi ₹25K for hiding facts in her defamation suit against journalist Rajdeep Sardesai over a video...
Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Goods and Services Tax : HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA: Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank [WPO NO. 547 OF 2019 JUNE 24, 2022 ] Facts: ♦ Petitioner is a holder ...
Goods and Services Tax : CGST, Gurugram (Anti Evasion) Vs Gaurav Dhir (Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts, Gurugram) U/s 132(1)) r/w 132(1)(b)(C)(e...
Corporate Law : In order to dispense with the physical signatures on the daily orders (which are not important/final orders and judgments) of the ...
Goods and Services Tax : Kerala High Court held that college, managed by an education trust, engaged in supplying food to students through canteen is requi...
Goods and Services Tax : Allahabad HC directs U.P. State to clarify STO's power to impose GST penalty under Rule 86B and Section 129....
Goods and Services Tax : Bombay HC rules on GST applicability to developer agreements, distinguishing them from TDR/FSI transfers under Entry 5B of GST not...
Goods and Services Tax : Bombay High Court grants interim relief in GST dispute on land development rights under a revenue-sharing agreement between Nirmal...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court declines to quash reassessment notice against Sanjay Patel, citing incomplete information and liberty to appeal....
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court has exempted the Lawyers from wearing Gowns practicing in the High Court with effect from March 2, 2022 till furt...
Zaveri and Co Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) 1. Mr. Uchit Sheth, learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has challenged rule 96 (10) (b) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 insofar as the same has been given retrospective effect. It was pointed out that […]
Delay of three years in filing of application for registration under section 12A was condonable as assessee which was enjoying exemption from income-tax from its inception was suddenly faced with the prospect of being made liable under the taxing statute and due to same, assessee had filed applications under Section 12AA with considerable delay.
I reckon the petitioner has exercised on time its statutory remedy of filing an appeal. It appears that it has also filed a stay petition. Procedural fairness demands that the authorities may wait, before taking further steps, until the appellate authority decides on the stay petition.
Deduction under section 35D for amortisation of preliminary expenses in connection with the issue of shares for public subscription was allowable to assessee bank extending financial services.
The word reasonable has in law prima facie meaning of reasonable in regard to those circumstances of which the person concerned is called upon to act reasonably knows or ought to know as to what was reasonable. It may be unreasonable to give an exact definition of the word reasonable.
It was held that Amount received by assessee from his father out of sum received by father for transfer of mining lease right to a Company in which assessee was shareholder cannot be treated as deemed dividend income of the assessee under section 2(22)(e) as sum was not received on behalf of Assessee and it was for a commercial transaction.
S/S Patel Hardware Vs Commissioner (Allahabad High Court) Keeping in mind the fact that the delay in filing the appeal may not be condoned beyond the period of one month from the expiry of period of limitation, the phrase “communicated to such person” appearing in Section 107(1) of the Act commend a construction that would […]
AAP And Co., Chartered Accounts Vs. Union of India (Gujarat High Court) Press release for Form GST-3B changing last date for credit challenged: Gujarat High Court issues notice to Centre, GST Council and State Petitioner chartered accountant firm “AAP & Co.” challenged the Press release dated 18.10.2018 to the extent that the last date for […]
Jagannath Dey Vs Mrinal Mallik S/o Gourchandra Mallik (High court Chhattisgarh) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant would seek permission of the Court to withdraw this appeal with liberty to move a fresh suit under the provisions of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 seeking custody of the minor. 2. In Shiv Kumar Sharma v […]
Transfer of patent rights would be subject to CST as while transferring of intangible rights obtained under a statute, to another entity having its place of business in another State; from where the transferee intended to exercise such rights thereafter, postulated a movement of the intangible, corporeal goods from one State to another and, hence, would be an inter-state sale assessable to tax.
