Goods and Services Tax : The AAR Rajasthan in the case of In Re. Shri Digamber Jain Sidhkut Chaityalaya Temple Trust [Advance Ruling No. RAJ/AAR/2023-24/22...
Goods and Services Tax : Read the Karnataka AAR ruling on Changejar Technologies' status as an e-commerce operator, implications for digital gold sales, an...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore Gujarat AAR ruling in M/s. Waaree Energies Limited case, clarifying SEZ units exemption from GST under Reverse Charge Mech...
Goods and Services Tax : Read about the Bombay High Court's decision in Prasanna Kumar Shetty v. State of Maharashtra, where recovery proceedings against a...
Goods and Services Tax : Read about landmark judgment by Bombay High Court in Shantanu Sanjay Hundekari v. Union of India and Ors, where a penalty demand o...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the case of Pradeep Kanthed v. Union of India where the Supreme Court issues notice to the Finance Ministry regarding the ...
Goods and Services Tax : Commissioner of Central Goods And Service Tax & Ors Vs Safari Retreats Private Limited & Ors (Supreme Court of India) The ...
Goods and Services Tax : The 45th meeting of Goods and Services Tax Council (“GST Council”) is scheduled to be held on September 17, 2021. The Ministry...
Custom Duty, Income Tax : The Karnataka High Court in M/s Pellagic Food Ingredients Private Ltd. v. Union of India [Writ Petition No. 14737/2021[T-CUS] issu...
Goods and Services Tax : AIMTPA – All India MSME and Tax Professionals Association has invited two GST Experts on it’s Platform on 24th July 2021 and a...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn about the Patna High Court's ruling in Pawan Carrying Corporation v. State of Bihar clarifying the seven-day timeline for is...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the Kerala High Court's decision in Vadakkot Chackoo Devassy v. State of Kerala, where the assessment order was invalidate...
Goods and Services Tax : Delhi High Court issues notice to decide if providing a corporate guarantee by a holding company to a subsidiary is taxable under ...
Goods and Services Tax : In Kanak Timber House v. Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Calcutta High Court rules seized goods can't be released via writ pe...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore how Madras High Court quashed Assessment Order when Assessee incorrectly reported turnover in GSTR-1 but correctly in GSTR...
Excise Duty : Notification No. 32/2015-Central Excise Dated- 4th June, 2015 Ethanol produced from molasses generated from cane crushed in the ...
Service Tax : Circular No. 184/3/2015-ST Dated the 3rd June, 2015 It is further clarified that exemption from service tax still continues to ser...
Custom Duty : the floods in the State of Jammu and Kashmir (the State) from whole of the duty as specified under the First Schedule and whole of...
Excise Duty : Grants exemption from Basic Excise Duty to goods donated or purchased out of cash donations for the relief and rehabilitation of p...
Custom Duty : New posts have been created in the rank of Commissioners of Customs in DRI and DGCEI for adjudication of cases as investigated by ...
In re Shree Powertech (GST AAR West Bengal) Sub-contractor would not be eligible for GST concession rate as main contractor on shifting of electrical utilities The West Bengal Authority of Advance Ruling (“the WBAAR”) in Re: M/s Shree Powertech [WBAAR 17 of 2022 dated October 21, 2022] ruled that the subcontractors are not eligible for […]
SC held that Argument of promissory estoppel not valid in limiting erstwhile Area based exemption to upto 58% under GST
CESTAT held that Hotel accommodation service received by appellant is an eligible input service under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004
AAR Haryana held that Recoveries On Account Of Notice Pay, Bond Forfeiture, Canteen Charges, ID Cards Replacement As Well As The Liquidated Damages & Forfeiture Of Earnest Money and Security Deposit Not Taxable Under GST.
Whether or not refund of IGST on exported goods will be allowed in the present petition after deduction of the drawback duty?
Held that since the audit proceedings under Section 65 of the CGST Act was already commenced by the …., it is but appropriate that the proceedings should be taken to the logical end by the …., and the proceedings in
HC held that the filing of a reply to the show-cause notice in form GST-DRC-06 is not mandatory under Section 73(9), 74(9) and 76(3) of CGST Act and reply so filed through post shall also be treated as valid.
High Court dismissed the petition stating that the terms of e-auction provided that any dispute is arbitrable and the Appellant is virtually seeking the enforcement of a contract through a writ petition for raising a claim for refund.
SC directed adjudicating authority to complete penalty proceedings on remand, at the earliest preferably within a period of six months from the date of this judgment as the penalty proceedings were reported to be pending pursuant to the remand order passed by the CESTAT.
HC held that, GST Notice which failed to mention allegations of fake invoices against assessee is not valid and warned department to strictly give proper training to officers.
