This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Statutory right to appeal cannot be defeated by drawing a presumption about service of order
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sunbright Cement Agencies Pvt Ltd. Vs Commissioner (Appeals), Service Tax-II, Mumbai (CESTAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Sunbright Cement Agencies Pvt Ltd. Vs. Commissioner (Appeals) (CESTAT Mumbai)
What is important to note is that even the initial period of three months provided for in sub-section (3) of section 85 of the Finance Act for presenting an appeal begins to run from the date of receipt of the order. The order was received by the appellant only on July 05, 2021. The Commissioner (Appeals) has drawn a presumption that the order was served upon the appellant in 2009 itself, because of the communication dated February 10, 2009 of the Superintendent (Adjudication) requesting the Assistan...
