This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Denial of Cenvat on input services like car hire charges, travel expenses, insurance charges, etc. not maintainable
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ETA Travel Agency Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Service Tax MHU Complex (CESTAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ETA Travel Agency Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Service Tax MHU Complex (CESTAT Chennai)
CESTAT Delhi held that denial of Cenvat credit on input services such as Car hire charges, Insurance charges, Travel expenses and Staff welfare expenses is not legally maintainable in terms of Rule 2 (1) of CCR, 2004.
Facts- M/s. ETA Travel Agency Pvt. Ltd., were engaged in providing Air Travel Agent Service ( ATAS ) and Business Auxiliary Service (BAS). The appellants availed the credit of various input services received. Three Show Cause Notices were issued for recovery of Cenvat Credit w...
Author Info
