Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ETA Travel Agency Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Service Tax MHU Complex (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ETA Travel Agency Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Service Tax MHU Complex (CESTAT Chennai) CESTAT Delhi held that denial of Cenvat credit on input services such as Car hire charges, Insurance charges, Travel expenses and Staff welfare expenses is not legally maintainable in terms of Rule 2 (1) of CCR, 2004. Facts- M/s. ETA Travel Agency Pvt. Ltd., were engaged in providing Air Travel Agent Service ( ATAS ) and Business Auxiliary Service (BAS). The appellants availed the credit of various input services received. Three Show Cause Notices were issued for recovery of Cenvat Credit wrongly taken and ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930