Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner Of Service Tax Vs M/s Sundaram Fasteners Ltd. (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
review of an Order-in-Appeal involves application of mind and that the mind of the Committee of Commissioner was exercised so as to accept the impugned Order-in-appeal, and hence the question of once again reviewing the Order-in-Appeal does not arise. IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SOUTH ZONAL BENCH, CHENNAI ST/COD/526/2010 and ST/692/2010 Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. 106/2009 (M-ST) Dated: 24.12.2009 Passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Chennai Date of Decision: 7.2.2011 COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, CHENNAI Vs M/s SUNDARAM...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930