Demand cannot be raised merely for difference in ST-3 returns & Form 26AS

Kush Constructions Vs CGST NACIN (CESTAT Allahabad)

After hearing both the sides duly represented by Shri A.K. Singh authorized representative of the appellant on behalf of the appellant and Shri Shiv Pratap Singh learned A.R. on behalf of the Revenue, we note that through impugned orPlease become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.