Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Erweka India Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Erweka India Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad) The issue involved in the present case is whether the appellants refund filed after one year from the relevant date is hit by limitation in terms of Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944. CESTAT held that under Section 11B(1) of Central Excise Act, 1944, the period of one year will not apply if the assessee paid duty under protest. In the present case also, it is not in dispute that service tax was paid under protest therefore, the limitation of one year is prima-facie not applicable. FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT AHMEDABAD...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031