Case Law Details
Case Name : P. Giribabu Vs. Dy. Director of Enforcement (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Madras High Court
Sponsored
SUMMARY OF THE CASE LAWS
The relief sought for by the petitioner seeking permission to be accompanied by an advocate of his choice when he appears before the Enforcement Directorate in pursuance of the summons issued under section 37 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and recording of statement in the presence of an advocate who will be present beyond the hearing distance does not require any consideration.
< Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
“Petitioner has no right to take his counsel with him at time when his statement is recorded by Enforcement Directorate pursuant to summons issued u/s 37 of FEMA, 1999”
Aug 20, 2010
Sir, isn’t Infringment of fundamental Right ?, I have appeared in one case where I have find that the authority cocern wants to Statements as he wish and twisting the question and metioning only for his use. The Petitioners find him self helpless at that time, if the Law is adament to infriged fundamental right, but it should be mendetary to start camera and recorder for establishment of facts, if these facility will not be introduce, the Act should be challeged for null and voide.