Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Satish Chand Agarwal, Prop. Sumit Medical Hall Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Satish Chand Agarwal, Prop. Sumit Medical Hall Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) It is trite law that Section 133A does not empower any Income tax authority to examine any person on oath and then use it as evidence to make addition. In such a situation, no addition can be made or sustained only on the basis of the statement recorded during the survey U/s 133A of the Act. Once the assessee has retracted from the statement then it was on the A.O. to establish beyond any doubt the issues on which the addition has been made. Once the assessee has submitted up to date cash book and stock register then it was du...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930