Understanding Tax Deductions under Section 194C and Collections under Section 206C(1H) in Transactions with Government Entities under Section 196 of the Income Tax Act, 1961: A Case Study
Introduction:
In the intricate world of taxation, transactions involving government entities often present unique challenges and considerations. One such area of complexity arises in the deduction and collection of taxes when dealing with government suppliers. This article delves into a case study involving a retailer, Mr. A, and the Indian Oil Corporation (IOC), shedding light on the nuances of tax deductions and collections in such transactions.
The Scenario:
Mr. A, a retailer, regularly purchases oil from the Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) for his business operations. Recently, upon receiving a bill from IOC for the supply of oil along with freight charges, Mr. A made a decision that sparked a disagreement. While settling the payment, Mr. A deducted a TDS (Tax Deducted at Source) of 2% on the freight charges under Section 194C of the Income Tax Act.
Understanding Tax Deductions and Collections:
Section 194C of the Income Tax Act mandates the deduction of TDS by any person making a payment to a resident contractor for carrying out any work, including the supply of goods and transport services. However, an exception exists for payments made to certain specified entities, including the government. In such cases, Tax Collected at Source (TCS) may be applicable instead of TDS.
The Legal Perspective:
When dealing with transactions involving government entities like IOC, it’s crucial to understand the applicable tax regulations. In this case, if IOC is considered a government entity, Mr. A’s deduction of TDS may not be required. Instead, IOC would be responsible for collecting TCS under section 206C(1H) at the time of sale to Mr. A. Therefore, Mr. A’s action of deducting TDS on freight charges could be questioned, particularly if TCS was already collected by IOC.
Resolution and Conclusion:
In navigating such tax-related disputes, it’s essential for parties involved to seek clarity on their tax obligations and rights. Consulting with tax advisors or legal experts well-versed in the relevant tax laws and regulations is paramount. Clear communication and understanding between parties can help avoid misunderstandings and disagreements regarding tax deductions and collections in transactions with government entities.
Final Thoughts:
The case of Mr. A and the Indian Oil Corporation highlights the importance of awareness and compliance with tax regulations, especially in dealings with government entities. By understanding the distinctions between TDS and TCS and the specific rules governing transactions with government suppliers, businesses can ensure smooth and legally compliant operations. Ultimately, clarity, communication, and adherence to tax laws are key in resolving such tax-related disputes effectively.
For Your Further Reference:
I. Section 196 of the Income Tax Act,1961
II. Section 194C of the Income Tax Act,1961
III. Section 206C(1H) of the Income Tax Act,1961
Section 196 of the Income Tax Act,1961
In accordance with the provisions outlined in Section 196 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, it is important to note that Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) does not apply to payments made to certain government entities. This section explicitly states that no TDS shall be deducted from sums payable to entities such as the government, the Reserve Bank of India, certain corporations established under a Central Act that are exempt from income tax, and mutual funds specified under section 10(23D).
Additionally, Circular No. 18/2017, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), provides further clarification on this matter. It specifies that entities whose income is unconditionally exempt under Section 10 of the Income-tax Act and who are not required to file a return of income as per Section 139 of the Act, are not subject to TDS on the payments made to them.
This exemption extends to various institutions, including local authorities, certain funds established by the armed forces, and regulatory bodies such as the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority, among others.
For specific cases or for further clarification on this matter, it is advisable to seek guidance from a tax professional or to refer to the latest guidelines issued by the CBDT. Clarifying doubts and ensuring compliance with relevant tax laws is crucial for businesses to operate smoothly and avoid any potential legal implications.
Examples based on the provisions outlined in Section 196 of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
Example 1: Payment to a Government Department
Scenario: A private construction company has completed a project for a government department, and the government owes them Rs. 5,00,000 for the work done.
Application:
As per Section 196, no TDS is applicable on payments made to government entities.
Therefore, no TDS will be deducted from the Rs. 5,00,000 owed to the private construction company by the government department.
Example 2: Payment to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
Scenario: A financial institution has earned interest income of Rs. 2,00,000 from its investments in government securities managed by the RBI.
Application:
Section 196 specifies that no TDS shall be deducted from payments made to the RBI.
Therefore, the financial institution will not deduct any TDS on the interest income of Rs. 2,00,000 earned from investments in government securities.
Example 3: Payment to a Mutual Fund Specified under Section 10(23D)
Scenario: An individual investor receives dividend income of Rs. 50,000 from a mutual fund specified under Section 10(23D) of the Income Tax Act.
Application:
Section 196 exempts mutual funds specified under Section 10(23D) from TDS.
Therefore, no TDS will be deducted from the dividend income of Rs. 50,000 received by the individual investor from the specified mutual fund.
Example 4: Payment to a Local Authority
Scenario: A private company rents office space from the local municipality and pays Rs. 1,00,000 per month as rent.
Application:
Local authorities are exempt from TDS under Section 196.
Therefore, no TDS will be deducted by the private company on the rent payment of Rs. 1,00,000 per month made to the local municipality.
These examples illustrate how payments to certain government entities, RBI, mutual funds specified under Section 10(23D), and other exempt institutions are not subject to TDS as per the provisions of Section 196 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Section 194C of the Income Tax Act,1961
Section 194C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is a crucial provision governing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) on payments made to contractors and subcontractors. This section delineates the rates and conditions under which TDS must be deducted. Here’s a detailed breakdown of the key points regarding TDS rates under this section:
General TDS Rates: The TDS rates specified under Section 194C vary based on the nature of the contractor or subcontractor. For payments made to individual contractors or Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs), the general TDS rate stands at 1%.
TDS Rate for Other Entities: In cases where payments are made to entities other than individuals or HUFs, such as companies, the TDS rate is set at a slightly higher rate of 2%. This distinction in rates aims to ensure equitable tax deductions across different types of contractors.
No TDS is applicable where the amount payable does not exceed:
(i) Rs. 30,000 in the case of a single contract.
(ii) Rs. 1,00,000 in the case of the aggregate of contracts during a Financial Year.
Examples based on the provisions of Section 194C of the Income Tax Act, 1961: Example 1: TDS Applicable for Individual Contractor
Scenario: A company hires an individual contractor to provide consulting services. The total payment for the contract is Rs. 40,000.
Calculation:
As per Section 194C, since the payment is made to an individual contractor and exceeds Rs. 30,000 for a single contract, TDS is applicable.
The TDS rate for individual contractors is 1%.
Therefore, the TDS to be deducted is 1% of Rs. 40,000 = Rs. 400.
Example 2: TDS Applicable for Non-Individual Contractor
Scenario: A company hires a registered company to undertake construction work. The total payment for the contract is Rs. 1,50,000.
Calculation:
Since the payment is made to a company and exceeds Rs. 30,000 for a single contract, TDS is applicable.
The TDS rate for non-individual contractors is 2%.
Therefore, the TDS to be deducted is 2% of Rs. 1,50,000 = Rs. 3,000.
Example 3: No TDS Applicable
Scenario: A company hires an individual contractor to provide maintenance services. The total payment for the contract is Rs. 25,000.
Calculation:
As per Section 194C, no TDS is applicable if the amount payable does not exceed Rs. 30,000 for a single contract.
Since the payment is only Rs. 25,000, which is less than Rs. 30,000, no TDS is deducted.
Example 4: Aggregate Consideration for TDS Calculation
Scenario: A company hires an individual contractor for various projects throughout the financial year. Each project payment is Rs. 20,000, but the total payments aggregate to Rs. 1,20,000 for the financial year.
Calculation:
Though each contract individually is less than Rs. 30,000, the aggregate of contracts during the financial year exceeds Rs. 1,00,000.
Hence, TDS is applicable.
The TDS rate for individual contractors is 1%.
Therefore, the TDS to be deducted is 1% of Rs. 1,20,000 = Rs. 1,200.
These examples illustrate how TDS is calculated and applied based on the provisions of Section 194C of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Section 206C(1H) of the Income Tax Act,1961
Section 206C(1H) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, introduced by the Finance Act 2020, brings into effect the mechanism of Tax Collected at Source (TCS) on the sale of goods. This provision aims to widen the tax net and enhance revenue collection by imposing a collection mechanism at the source of certain transactions. Here’s a detailed elucidation of the key points pertaining to Section 206C(1H):
Applicability Criteria: Section 206C(1H) applies to sellers whose total sales, gross receipts, or turnover from their business exceed Rs. 10 crores in the financial year preceding the current financial year. This criterion ensures that the TCS obligation is imposed on businesses with substantial turnover, thereby capturing transactions of significant economic significance.
Threshold for TCS: TCS is triggered when the sale consideration received from a buyer exceeds Rs. 50 lakhs in any previous year. This threshold delineates the transactions subject to TCS, focusing on high-value sales that warrant additional tax compliance measures.
Rate of TCS: The rate of TCS under Section 206C(1H) is 0.1% of the sale consideration exceeding Rs. 50 lakhs. This rate serves as the standard levy on eligible transactions, facilitating tax collection at the time of sale itself.
Impact of Non-Provision of PAN or Aadhaar: In instances where the buyer fails to furnish their PAN (Permanent Account Number) or Aadhaar number, the TCS rate escalates to 1%, contrasting with the standard rate of 0.1%. This provision incentivizes buyers to provide their PAN or Aadhaar details, thereby facilitating proper tax documentation and compliance.
Effective Date and COVID-19 Implications: These provisions were initially slated to be effective from 1st October 2020. However, owing to the unforeseen challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the government intervened by reducing the TCS rate to 0.075% until 31st March 2021. This temporary reduction aimed to alleviate the financial burden on businesses amidst the economic disruptions caused by the pandemic.
In essence, Section 206C(1H) introduces a robust mechanism for tax collection at the source on the sale of goods, targeting high-value transactions and enhancing tax compliance. By imposing TCS obligations on eligible sellers, the provision fosters transparency and accountability in the taxation framework, contributing to the broader objectives of revenue mobilization and fiscal discipline.
Here are a few examples illustrating the application of Section 206C(1H) of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
Example 1: Retailer exceeding turnover threshold
Let’s say XYZ Retailers Pvt. Ltd. is a company engaged in the sale of electronic appliances. In the financial year 2021-2022, XYZ Retailers’ total turnover from its business operations amounted to Rs. 15 crores. During the same period, they sold electronic appliances worth Rs. 60 lakhs to a corporate buyer. In this scenario:
XYZ Retailers Pvt. Ltd. is subject to TCS under Section 206C(1H) due to its turnover exceeding Rs. 10 crores.
Since the sale consideration from the corporate buyer exceeds Rs. 50 lakhs, TCS is applicable.
The TCS rate applicable would be 0.1% on the sale consideration exceeding Rs. 50 lakhs, i.e., (Rs. 60 lakhs – Rs. 50 lakhs) * 0.1%.
Example 2: TCS rate variation due to buyer’s PAN or Aadhaar status
Continuing with the above example, let’s assume that the corporate buyer does not provide their PAN or Aadhaar details to XYZ Retailers Pvt. Ltd. In such a scenario:
The TCS rate applicable would increase from 0.1% to 1% on the entire sale consideration exceeding Rs. 50 lakhs.
Therefore, XYZ Retailers Pvt. Ltd. would collect TCS at a higher rate due to the buyer’s non-provision of PAN or Aadhaar details.
Conclusion: In conclusion, clarity and compliance are paramount in navigating tax-related disputes, especially with government entities. Understanding the distinctions between TDS and TCS is crucial for smooth operations. Seek guidance from tax professionals to ensure adherence to tax laws.
*****
Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal, tax, or financial advice. The application of tax deductions under Section 194(C) and collections under Section 206 C(1H) in transactions with government entities under Section 196 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, may vary based on specific circumstances, contractual agreements, and prevailing tax regulations. Readers are advised to consult with qualified tax advisors or legal experts familiar with Indian tax laws and contract law to obtain personalized guidance tailored to their individual situations. Additionally, tax laws and regulations are subject to change, and the information provided in this article may not reflect the most current updates. The author and publisher of this article disclaim any liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the information provided herein.
Author Bio
