Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs. Idea Cellular Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 1. These appeals were admitted on the following question of law: “Whether on a true and correct appreciation of the relationship between the assessee and its distributors, the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in holding that the payments paid by the assessee is not commission as envisaged under Section 194H of the Act?” This question has arisen for determination for the Assessment Years 2003-04 and 2004-05. 2. A survey under Section 133 of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was conducted at the premises of the respondent-assessee (...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. chitta ranjan singh says:

    what is the Diff Between U/S 94 H & U/S 194 H

    If there is negetive , then give comment, & why it is used now to confuse the tax payer by pursuing it. similarly from A to H u/s 94 also applied now.

    Thanks From
    Chittaranjan singh
    Mob-9338466517
    Orissa, India
    Bhubaneswar.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930