This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 271G Penalty Deleted as Substantial TP Compliance & Reasonable Cause Established: ITAT Mumbai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DCIT Vs D. Navinchandra Gems Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
DCIT Vs D. Navinchandra Gems Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
The ITAT Mumbai disposed of Revenue’s appeals for Assessment Years 2013-14 and 2015-16 challenging the orders of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), which had deleted penalties levied under Section 271G of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The penalties arose from transfer pricing proceedings under Section 92CA(3), where the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) alleged non-furnishing of prescribed documentation under Section 92D read with Rule 10D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962.
The assessee, engaged in the business of im...





