Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sandeep Vimalchand Gadiya Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sandeep Vimalchand Gadiya Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Non-Compliance Cured with Cost: ₹25,000 Cost Imposed as ITAT Revives Reassessment on Cash Deposits One More Chance, but at a Price – Email Missed, Justice Remains: Bangalore ITAT Orders De-Novo Assessment Bangalore ITAT “B” Bench, in Sandeep Vimalchand Gadiya Vs ITO (ITA No. 2404/Bang/2024, AY 2012-13; order dated 31.01.2025), set aside the reassessment order passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 & restored the matter to the file of AO for de-novo adjudication, subject to payment of cost of ₹25,000. Reassessment was initiated on account o...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930